Quoting%20commentary for Makkot 39:2

וזר שאכלה לוקה שתים שאילו בתחלה אכלה אינו לוקה אלא אחת

But if he was a zar [non-Kohen] he would have received two sets of malkus. But if he had originally eaten it [without designating any tithes] he would have only been liable one set of malkus.

Explore quoting%20commentary for Makkot 39:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.